| dc.contributor.author | 
Du Plessis, Hanri Magdalena 
 | 
 | 
| dc.date.accessioned | 
2018-06-14T09:46:10Z | 
 | 
| dc.date.available | 
2018-06-14T09:46:10Z | 
 | 
| dc.date.issued | 
2015 | 
 | 
| dc.identifier.citation | 
Hanri du Plessis "Display of goods for sale, advertisements and the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008" 2015 (1) South African Law Journal 150-169 | 
en | 
| dc.identifier.issn | 
1996-2177 | 
 | 
| dc.identifier.uri | 
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/24372 | 
 | 
| dc.description.abstract | 
The article investigates the influence of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (‘the
CPA’) on the general rule that the advertising or display of goods for sale at a certain price
is an invitation to do business and not an offer to sell. The article critically discusses the
common-law position and argues that although a general rule exists in favour of
advertisements being regarded as invitations to do business, no such general rule exists in
respect of the physical display of goods at a certain price. Furthermore, although it remains
a factual question whether an offer exists, the underlying policy considerations must also
be taken into account. Thereafter, the article investigates the meaning and influence of the
CPA on the common-law position. It is argued that the relevant provisions in the CPA
(ss 23, 29 and 30) require that the display of goods at a certain price generally would be
viewed as an offer. Furthermore, it is argued that while the CPA has not amended the
common-law rule in respect of advertisements, it has improved the consumer’s position by
prohibiting misleading advertisements and by placing certain obligations on a supplier if it
cannot fulfil the promises in its advertisements. | 
en | 
| dc.language.iso | 
en | 
en | 
| dc.publisher | 
Juta | 
en | 
| dc.title | 
Display of goods for sale, advertisements and the Consumer Protection Act | 
en | 
| dc.type | 
Article | 
en | 
| dc.description.department | 
Private Law | 
en |