| dc.contributor.author | 
Van der Poll, J.A. 
 | 
 | 
| dc.contributor.author | 
Labuschagne, W.A. 
 | 
 | 
| dc.date.accessioned | 
2012-02-09T06:55:34Z | 
 | 
| dc.date.available | 
2012-02-09T06:55:34Z | 
 | 
| dc.date.issued | 
1999-07 | 
 | 
| dc.identifier.citation | 
Van der Poll, J.A. & Labuschange, W.A. 1999,'Heuristics for resolution-based set-theoretic proofs', South African computer journal, Vol. 51, no. 23, pp.3-17. | 
en | 
| dc.identifier.uri | 
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5371 | 
 | 
| dc.description.abstract | 
A formal specification language like Z permits the specifier to construct proofs which collaborate the aptness of the specification. This process may be facilitated by establishing a partnership between the specifier and a suitable automated reasoner. However, Z specifications are essentially set-theoretic proofs pose demanding challenges to automated reasoners. Taking the OTTER theorem-prover to be representative of resolution-based automated reasoners, we propose a number of heuristics intended to cut down the search space for proofs involving typical set-theoretic structures. | 
en | 
| dc.language.iso | 
en | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
Heuristics | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
Resolution-based set-theoretic proofs | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
Problem frames | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
Resolution | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
Set theories | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
Theorem-proving | 
en | 
| dc.title | 
Heuristics for resolution-based set-theoretic proofs | 
en | 
| dc.type | 
Article | 
en |