Institutional Repository

Legal regulation of surrogate motherhood in Ghana: A comparative study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Labuschagne, Melodie
dc.contributor.author Yengkangyi, Millicent
dc.date.accessioned 2026-10-20T06:14:47Z
dc.date.available 2026-10-20T06:14:47Z
dc.date.issued 2026-03
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/33178
dc.description.abstract The thesis investigates the regulation of surrogate motherhood in Ghana, highlighting the legal vacuum that currently surrounds the practice. It begins by situating surrogacy within the broader cultural, social, and religious context of Ghana, where childbearing is highly valued, infertility often leads to stigma and divorce, and adoption is viewed as a last resort. Against this background, many childless couples are turning to surrogacy, even though it remains inadequately regulated and largely practiced covertly. The research underscores several problems arising from the lack of regulation, such as the exploitation of vulnerable women from low-income backgrounds, the unequal bargaining power between intended parents and surrogates, and the occurrence of contractual breaches due to weak or non-existent legal safeguards. It also highlights challenges like custody disputes and the abandonment of surrogate children, along with the exorbitant costs imposed by private clinics, which effectively exclude poorer couples from accessing surrogacy services. The study also emphasises the human-rights implications, particularly regarding reproductive rights, bodily autonomy, dignity, and the best interests of children born through surrogacy. It draws on international instruments such as the UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR, CEDAW, CRC, CRPD, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, as well as Ghana’s 1992 Constitution and Children’s Act. To address this legal uncertainty, the thesis undertakes a comparative legal analysis with South Africa, which has one of the most progressive constitutional democracies in Africa. South Africa’s Children’s Act allows only altruistic surrogacy and provides judicial oversight, medical guidelines, and human rights protection for all parties. The thesis argues that this model offers a valuable framework for Ghana to adapt, given the similarities in culture and human rights commitments between the two countries. The expected contribution of the thesis is to propose a clear, workable, culturally appropriate and just legal framework for regulating surrogate motherhood in Ghana, thereby ensuring legal certainty, protecting surrogate mothers, intended parents and children, providing guidance for healthcare professionals, lawyers and courts, and serving as a potential policy reference for other Sub-Saharan African countries. en_US
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xx, 316 leaves)
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject legal regulation en_US
dc.subject surrogacy en_US
dc.subject Ghana en_US
dc.subject assisted reproductive technologies en_US
dc.subject parentage en_US
dc.subject adoption en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Comparative law
dc.subject.lcsh Surrogate motherhood -- Law and legislation -- Ghana
dc.subject.lcsh Surrogate motherhood -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Human reproductive technology -- Law and legislation -- Ghana
dc.subject.other UCTD
dc.title Legal regulation of surrogate motherhood in Ghana: A comparative study en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.department College of Law
dc.description.degree Doctor of Laws
dc.date.updated 2026-10-15T18:20:54Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Unisa ETD [11127]
    Electronic versions of theses and dissertations submitted to Unisa since 2003

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics