| dc.contributor.author |
Ngwenyama, Lerato Rudolph
|
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2026-08-04T14:09:52Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2026-08-04T14:09:52Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2022-03-01 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://ir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/32882 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Initiations in South Africa ordinarily take place in June and December every year.
However, initiations were suspended in March 2020 when South Africa went on national
lockdown necessitated by the Covid-19 pandemic. The ban on initiations was only
applicable at alert level two and five. At alert level one, the Department of Co-operative
Governance and Traditional Affairs (“COGTA”) issued a statement stating that
initiations would remain suspended in an attempt to prevent the spread of Covid-19 and
to save the lives of initiates. However, the Eastern Cape Province was an exception
because initiation conductors made submissions to COGTA that they would comply with
all health protocol measures. This paper evaluates the South African government’s legislative and regulatory response to the Covid-19 pandemic – especially in the context
of customary practices such as initiation. In order to undertake an evaluation of the
government’s legislative and regulatory response to the pandemic, the paper considers
the following aspects: (1) which measures were put in place to regulate initiation schools;
(2) were the measures due to governmental regulation or did initiation school conductors
simply recognise the need to prevent the spread of Covid-19 by shutting down initiation
schools; and (3) more importantly, what are the constitutional implications (if any) of the
government’s legislative and regulatory response to the Covid-19 pandemic in terms of
prohibiting initiation. The paper concludes that the government adopted far-reaching
measures to prevent the spread of the Covid-19. These measures involved a restriction
on the right to participate in cultural initiation. However, in a national state of disaster
such as has been the case with the Covid-19, these measures are justifiable limitations of
the right to enjoy cultural initiation. |
en_US |
| dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
UPSA Africa International & Comparative Law Journal (UAICLJ) |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Initiation |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Government mitigation regulations |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Constitutional implications |
en_US |
| dc.title |
The impact of COVID-19 and government mitigation regulations on attending customary initiation schools in South Africa |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |