Institutional Repository

Structural performance of reinforced fly ash and slag-based geopolymer concrete beams using waste glass-derived sodium silicate as an alternative activator

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kolade, Anuoluwapo Sola
dc.date.accessioned 2026-06-29T19:21:56Z
dc.date.available 2026-06-29T19:21:56Z
dc.date.issued 2026-05
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/32685
dc.description Abstract in English with summaries in Zulu en_US
dc.description.abstract The pursuit of sustainable construction materials has advanced geopolymer concrete (GPC) as an alternative to Portland cement systems. However, most GPC systems rely on commercial sodium silicate (CSS), whose high cost, energy demand and environmental impacts limit its large-scale sustainable application. This study therefore investigated the structural performance and sustainability of reinforced fly ash–slag (FA–GGBFS) GPC beams using sodium silicate synthesized from waste glass (WGSS) as an alternative activator to CSS. Mix designs derived from oxide composition analysis of the constituent materials were proportioned to produce medium-strength structural GPC and enable comparison between CSS and WGSS activator systems. Mechanical characterization, reinforced beam testing under three-point loading and life cycle assessment (LCA) following ISO 14040 were conducted, with structural performance validated against Eurocode 2. The WGSS concrete mixes with FA:GGBFS ratios of 1:0, 7:1 and 3:1 achieved 28-day compressive strengths of 26.64, 40.17 and 45.74 MPa, respectively, while the control CSS concrete (FA:GGBFS = 1:0) reached 94.75 MPa. Among the WGSS formulations, the 7:1 mix demonstrated the most balanced structural, environmental and economic performance. Beams produced with this mix achieved a flexural moment capacity of 11.56 kNm, comparable to the 11.46 kNm recorded for the CSS control beam, while exhibiting greater mid-span deflection (7.2 mm vs 5.3 mm), indicating improved ductility despite the lower compressive strength. LCA further showed reductions in carbon emissions (~31%) and production cost (~10%) relative to the CSS system. These results demonstrate that WGSS-based GPC can achieve adequate structural capacity relative to design predictions while providing notable environmental and economic advantages for sustainable infrastructure applications. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Geopolymer concrete en_US
dc.subject Fly ash en_US
dc.subject Slag en_US
dc.subject Sodium silicate en_US
dc.subject Waste glass powder en_US
dc.subject Structural performance en_US
dc.subject Ductility en_US
dc.subject Sustainability en_US
dc.subject Carbon footprint en_US
dc.subject Waste valorization en_US
dc.title Structural performance of reinforced fly ash and slag-based geopolymer concrete beams using waste glass-derived sodium silicate as an alternative activator en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Unisa ETD [13271]
    Electronic versions of theses and dissertations submitted to Unisa since 2003

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics