dc.contributor.advisor |
Pistorius, Tana
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tladi, Sebolawe Erna Mokowadi
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-02-13T04:57:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-02-13T04:57:23Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-06 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Tladi, Sebolawe Erna Mokowadi (2017) The regulation of unsolicited electronic communications (SPAM) in South Africa : a comparative study, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/25265> |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/25265 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The practice of spamming (sending unsolicited electronic communications) has been dubbed “the scourge of the 21st century” affecting different stakeholders. This practice is also credited for not only disrupting electronic communications but also, it overloads electronic systems and creates unnecessary costs for those affected than the ones responsible for sending such communications. In trying to address this issue nations have implemented anti-spam laws to combat the scourge. South Africa not lagging behind, has put in place anti-spam provisions to deal with the scourge. The anti-spam provisions are scattered in pieces of legislation dealing with diverse issues including: consumer protection; direct marketing; credit laws; and electronic transactions and communications. In addition to these provisions, an Amendment Bill to one of these laws and two Bills covering cybercrimes and cyber-security issues have been published.
In this thesis, a question is asked on whether the current fragmented anti-spam provisions are adequate in protecting consumers. Whether the overlaps between these pieces of legislation are competent to deal with the ever increasing threats on electronic communications at large. Finally, the question as to whether a multi-faceted approach, which includes a Model Law on spam would be a suitable starting point setting out requirements for the sending of unsolicited electronic communications can be sufficient in protecting consumers. And as spam is not only a national but also a global problem, South Africa needs to look at the option of entering into mutual agreements with other countries and organisations in order to combat spam at a global level. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (xxi, 367 leaves) |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Anti-spam laws |
en |
dc.subject |
Commercial electronic messages |
en |
dc.subject |
Consumers |
en |
dc.subject |
Consent |
en |
dc.subject |
Direct marketing |
en |
dc.subject |
Dictionary attacks |
en |
dc.subject |
Disguising of headers (spoofing) |
en |
dc.subject |
Electronic communications |
en |
dc.subject |
Electronic mail (e-mail) |
en |
dc.subject |
Harvesting and sale of e-mail addresses |
en |
dc.subject |
International cooperation |
en |
dc.subject |
Opt-out mechanism |
en |
dc.subject |
Opt-in mechanism |
en |
dc.subject |
Personal information |
en |
dc.subject |
Spam |
en |
dc.subject |
Unsolicited bulk email |
en |
dc.subject |
Unsolicited commercial communications |
en |
dc.subject |
Unsolicited electronic communications |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
343.9944068 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Spam (Electronic mail) -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Telemarketing -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Electronic commerce -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Electronic mail systems -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Internet -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Privacy, Right of -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Consumer protection -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
en |
dc.title |
The regulation of unsolicited electronic communications (SPAM) in South Africa : a comparative study |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
dc.description.department |
Mercantile Law |
en |
dc.description.degree |
LL. D. |
|