| dc.contributor.author | 
Wiese, Mitzi 
 | 
 | 
| dc.date.accessioned | 
2018-01-25T12:50:47Z | 
 | 
| dc.date.available | 
2018-01-25T12:50:47Z | 
 | 
| dc.date.issued | 
2011 | 
 | 
| dc.identifier.citation | 
Wiese, M “Liens: A closer look at some conceptual foundations” 2011 CILSA vol XLIV, no 1, 80 | 
en | 
| dc.identifier.issn | 
00104051 | 
 | 
| dc.identifier.uri | 
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/23558 | 
 | 
| dc.description.abstract | 
Liens are classified differently in diverse legal systems. The classification
of a lien points towards the specific operation thereof. In South African law
we distinguish between enrichment liens (real liens) which are regarded as
real rights and debtor-creditor liens which are regarded as personal rights.
The Dutch law, on the other hand, no longer distinguishes between
zakenrechtelijke retentierechten (real liens) and verbintenisrechtelijke
retentierechten (debtor-creditor liens). All liens are classified as
opschortingsrechten with real operation. Scots law distinguishes between
general and special liens and all liens are classified as real rights. A lien is
an important and powerful legal remedy and a form of security. Liens are
very important in modern day South Africa where access to courts are
expensive and time consuming. In this article I look at certain conceptual
foundations of liens in South African law, Dutch law and Scots law. | 
en | 
| dc.language.iso | 
en | 
en | 
| dc.publisher | 
CILSA | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
liens | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
retensieregte | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
enrichment lien | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
verrykingsretensiereg | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
skuldeiser-skuldenaar retensiereg | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
debtor and creditor lien | 
en | 
| dc.subject | 
right of retention | 
en | 
| dc.title | 
Liens: A closer look at some conceptual foundations | 
en | 
| dc.type | 
Article | 
en | 
| dc.description.department | 
Private Law | 
en |